Japan’s economic security strategy: Securitization of China’s rising economic power?

The concept of economic security has received special attention from the Japanese government since 2019: several specialized state agencies have been created, and in May 2022 the Diet approved the Act on Provision of Economic Security. Economic security-related notions have also been included in the new National Security Strategy, published in December 2022. In this document, economic security is defined as protection of ‘Japan’s national interests, such as peace, security, and economic prosperity, by carrying out economic measures.’ It shall be noted that the current understanding of economic security is different from the one previously assumed, which was largely concerned with the provision of natural resources and food. We observe the concrete measures proposed in connection with the concept of economic security and highlight that the new understanding of the concept has been introduced in relation to the ongoing trade war between the U.S. and China, in which Japan supports the U.S. in its efforts against the certain advanced-tech companies from China. From the point of view of the securitization theory, claims that certain industries of the PRC’s economy present a threat to Japan’s security could be seen as ‘speech-acts’ aiming to legitimize the employment of extraordinary political measures. We emphasize that the apparent success of such speech-acts is grounded in the Japanese experts’ assessment that there are emergent technologies with the possibility of dual commercial and military use. In conclusion, we examine the securitization of China’s economy by the Japanese government in its current regional and global context and argue that it could be interpreted both as a signal to the U.S. and as an attempt to gain leverage in the competition between the Japanese and the Chinese infrastructural projects in the Asia-Pacific.

1. Afontsev, S.A. (2020). Kontseptual’nye osnovy analiza natsional’noi i mezhdunarodnoi ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti [Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of National and International Economic Security]. Na strazhe ekonomiki [The Economy Under Guard], 13(2), 27–47. (In Russian). DOI: 10.36511/2588- 0071-2020-2-27-47.

2. Gordienko, D.V. (2015). Globalizatsiya i obespechenie ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti Yaponii [Globalization and the Economic Security of Japan]. Natsional’nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost’ [National Interests: Priorities and Security], 11(15), 32–47. (In Russian).

3. Gospodarik, Yu.P., Pashkovskaya M.V. (2021). Osobennosti formirovaniya sistemy ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti Yaponii na sovremennom etape [Features of the Formation of the Economic Security System of Japan at the Present Stage]. Nauchnoe obozrenie: teoriya i praktika [Scientific Review: Theory and Practice], 11(4), 1166–1178. (In Russian). DOI: 10.35679/2226-0226-2021-11-4-1166-1178.

4. Streltsov, D.V. (2020). Kuda poidet politika Yaponii v sfere bezopasnosti posle smeny administratsii v Tokio i Vashingtone? [Where Will Japan’s Security Policy Go After the Change of Administrations in Tokyo and Washington?]. Vostochnaya Aziya: fakty i analitika [East Asia: Facts and Analytics], 4, 34–49. (In Russian). DOI: 10.24411/2686-7702-2020-10023.

5. Akao, N. (1983). Japanese Economic Security: Resource in Japanese Foreign Policy. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.

6. Armstrong, S., Urata, S. (2021). Japan First? Economic Security in a World of Uncertainty. Canberra: East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.

7. Barnhart, M.A. (2013). Japan Prepares for Total War: The Search for Economic Security, 1919–1941. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

8. Buzan, B., Wæver, O., De Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

9. Campion, A.S. (2020). From CNOOC to Huawei: Securitization, the China threat, and critical infrastructure. Asian Journal of Political Science, 28(1), 47–66. DOI: 10.1080/02185377.2020.174141.

10. Chubb, A. (2023). The Securitization of ‘Chinese Influence’ in Australia. Journal of Contemporary China, 32(139), 17–34. DOI: 10.1080/10670564.2022.2052437.

11. De Graaff, N., Van Apeldoorn, B. (2018). US–China relations and the liberal world order: contending elites, colliding visions? International Affairs, 94(1), 113–131. DOI: 10.1093/ia/iix23.

12. Harold, S. W., Kamijima-Tsunoda, R. (2021). Winning the 5G Race with China: a US-Japan Strategy to Trip the Competition, Run Faster, and Put the Fix in. Asia Policy, 28(3), 75–103.

13. Igata, A. (2022). Japan’s Burgeoning Economic Security Strategy: Navigating amidst US-China Competition. Fiesole: European University Institute.

14. Insisa,A., Pugliese G. (2022). The Free and Open Indo-Pacific versus the Belt and Road: Spheres of Influence and Sino-Japanese relations. The Pacific Review, 35(3), 557–585. DOI: 10.1080/09512748.2020.1862899.

15. Koga, K. (2020). Japan’s ‘Indo-Pacific’ Question: Countering China or Shaping a New Regional Order? International Affairs, 96(1), 49–73. DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiz241.

16. Koga, K. (2022). Alternative Strategic Partner in Southeast Asia? The role of Japan in the US-China Rivalry. In Shigehoi K. (ed.). Japan’s Role for Southeast Asia Amidst the Great Power Competition (pp. 7–16). Hanoi: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, Vietnam Office.

17. Oya, S. (2020). Improving Economic Security: Proposals from Japan. Lettre du Centre Asie, 88, 1–3.

18. Pardo, R. P. (2017). China, Japan, and Economic Security Competition (and Cooperation) in the Asia-Pacific. In Chinese–Japanese Competition and the East Asian Security Complex (pp. 71–85). Routledge.

19. Pothier, F., Vershbow, A. (2017). NATO and Trump: The Case for a New Transatlantic Bargain. Washington: The Atlantic Council.

20. Pugliese, G., Wallace, C. (2021). Japan 2021: The Liberal Democratic Party Emerges Stronger Despite Domestic Tumult. Asia Maior, 32, 63–94.

21. Suzuki, K. (2021). U.S.-China Technological Hegemony and Japan’s Economic Security. Fiesole: European University Institute. DOI: 10.2870/53704.

22. Yamada, T. (2021). Transforming the Dynamics of Climate Politics in Japan: Business’ Response to Securitization. Politics and Governance, 9(4), 65. DOI: 10.17645/pag.v9i4.4427.