Preview

Japanese Studies in Russia

Advanced search

Theoretical approaches to international relations in Japan

https://doi.org/10.24412/2500-2872-2021-2-92-109

Abstract

The article examines some aspects of the evolution of Japanese theoretical approaches to international relations (IR). A brief description of intellectual currents and concepts characteristic of the IR studies in the pre-war period is given, and their development after 1945 is considered as well. Japanese theoretical approaches to international relations mainly originate from Western schools of philosophy, political science, and law, but national peculiarities are traced in them. Western theories selectively lay on Japanese soil, and while some of them were further developed in the works of Japanese scholars, others, on the contrary, did not arouse much interest. In general, we can say that, under the influence of Western thought and Japanese traditions, distinctive concepts emerged in Japan. Japanese approaches to IR have evolved simultaneously with the conceptual rethinking of the surrounding world and Japan’s place in it, as well as its national identity. A feature of Japanese approaches to IR is the emphasis on their economic and cultural aspects, as well as the promotion of concepts that could ensure the global leadership of Japan as a non-military power. One can note the interest in the applied aspects of the IR theories, which make it possible to substantiate certain foreign policy goals. In general, theoretical approaches to IR tend more towards finding answers to specific questions than to abstract constructions. This reflects the peculiarities of the Japanese mentality and the characteristic features of Japanese political culture.

About the Author

O. A. Dobrinskaya
Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation; Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation


References

1. Богатуров А.Д, Косолапов Н.А, Хрусталев М.А. Очерки теории и политического анализа международных отношений. Москва: НОФМО. 2002

2. Грачиков Е. Китайская теория международных отношений: становление национальной школы // Международные процессы. 2016. Т. 14. № 3. С. 68-80. DOI 10.17994/IT.2016.14.3.46.5

3. Добринская О.А. Эволюция политики Японии в области обеспечения национальной безопасности Японии после крушения биполярной системы международных отношений. Дисс. на соискание степени к.и.н. М. 2005

4. Лебедева М. Незападные теории международных отношений: миф или реальность? // Вестник РУДН. Международные отношения. 2017. № 17. С. 246-256

5. Чугров С.В. Корни и тренды японских теорий международных отношений // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. 2020.Т. 64. № 5. С. 71-81

6. Akaneya, T. (1998). Japan // The new security agenda. A global survey. Tokyo.

7. Costigiola, F. (2000). Review: a cultural world order. Diplomatic history, 24(2), 377-379.

8. Funabashi, Y. (1995). Introduction: Japan’s international agenda for the 1990s // Japan’s international agenda. Tokyo.

9. Howe Ch., & Hook, B. (1996) China and Japan: history, trends and prospects. Oxford University Press.

10. Hughes, Ch. (1999). Japan’s economic power and security. Japan and North Korea. Routledge.

11. Ikeda, J. (2008). Japanese vision of international society. In K. Shimizu, J. Ikeda, T. Kamino, & S. Sato. Japanese international relations before 1945. Afrasian centre for peace and development studies, Ryukoku university.

12. Ikeda, S. (1996). History of world-system vs. history of East Asia. Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 19(1), 49-77.

13. Inoguchi, T. (2010). Why are there no non-Western theories of international relations. The case of Japan. In A. Acharya, & B. Buzan (Eds.), Non-western international relation theory. Routledge.

14. Kosaka, M. (2012). A realist theory of peace. Japan Forum, 24 (4), 397-411.

15. Manabe, S. (1999). Gendai Nihon-no gajkōron [Sovremennaya teoriya yaponskoj diplomatii]. Osaka.

16. Mine, Y. & Fukuda, S. (2012). Mainstreaming human security education and research: lessons from the networking activities in Japan. In Chantana Banpasirichote, Philippe Doneys, Mike Hayes, Chandan Sengupta (Eds.), Mainstreaming human security: Asian perspectives. Bangkok: Chulakongkorn University.

17. Nakano, R. (2007). ‘Pre-history’ of international relations in Japan: Yanaihara Tadao’s Dual perspectives of Empire. Millenium: Journal of International Studies, 35(2), March.

18. Nihon gajkō no kidōryoku to shite. Naze ningen no anzen hoshō nanoka [Why is human security the driving force of Japanese diplomacy?]. (2003). Gaikō fōramu, 12.

19. Sato, S., Ikeda, J., Ching Chang Chen, & Young Chul Cho. (2011). Re-examination of “Non-Western International Relations Theories. Kyoto working papers on Area studies No.118. June.

20. Shimizu, K. (2008) Culture and international relations. In K. Shimizu, J. Ikeda, T. Kamino, & S. Sato. Japanese international relations before 1945. Afrasian centre for peace and development studies, Ryukoku university.

21. Yamamoto, K. (2011). International relations studies and theories in Japan. International relations of the Asia Pacific, 11, 259-278.

22. Yamamoto, K. (2018). A triad of normative, pragmatic, and science-oriented approaches: the development in international relations theory in Japan revisited. The Korean Journal of International Studies, 16(1), April, 121-142.


Review

For citations:


Dobrinskaya O.A. Theoretical approaches to international relations in Japan. Japanese Studies in Russia. 2021;(2):92-109. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/2500-2872-2021-2-92-109

Views: 342


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2500-2872 (Online)