Japan’s Official Development Assistance to the Philippines: Assessment of effectiveness

Official Development Assistance (ODA) has been one of Japan's key foreign policy tools for over 70 years. Southeast Asian countries are among the primary recipients of Japanese ODA, with the Philippines being one of its major beneficiaries. Assistance is provided in the form of loans for infrastructure projects and social development initiatives, grants, and technical support aimed at personnel training and strengthening bureaucratic mechanisms. This article attempts to assess the effectiveness of Tokyo's ODA to Manila based on a set of identified criteria covering the political, economic, and social aspects. Most of the declared infrastructure projects have been implemented, and construction continues under long-term plans. ODA has facilitated diplomatic mediation in resolving the conflict in the Mindanao region. In the 21st century, a positive perception of Japan has formed among the Filipino population, as reflected in both Japanese surveys and Philippine media, granting Tokyo reputational dividends. The securitization of a portion of aid has led to enhanced military-technical cooperation, aligning with the national interests of both partners. Manila is now positioned not only as a developing country in need of assistance, but also as a strategic partner capable of contributing to security in East Asia. Positive dynamics are also evident in the support for Tokyo's resolutions in the UN General Assembly, which holds significance given Japan's fundamental goal of securing a permanent seat on the Security Council. Similarly, Manila regularly votes in favor of adopting resolutions on the DPRK issue initiated by Tokyo, which is one of Japan's strategic interests. The increasing investment attractiveness of the Philippines is partly attributed to decades of ODA, which strengthens future markets for Japanese business. It can be concluded that Japan's experience in providing aid to the Philippines has been relatively successful due to Tokyo's strategic efforts and well-established high-level bilateral cooperation.

1. Morozkina, A. K. (2019). Ofitsial'naya pomoshch' razvitiyu: tendentsii poslednego desyatiletiya [Official Development Assistance: Trends of the Last Decade]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [World Economy and International Relations], 63 (9), 86 92. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-9-86-92. (In Russian).

2. Sodeistvie mezhdunarodnomu razvitiyu. Kurs lektsii. (2012). [International Development Assistance. A Course of Lectures]. Edited by V. I. Bartenev and E.N. Glazunova. Moscow: Vsemirnyi bank. (In Russian).

3. Voda, K. R. (2016). Sodeistvie mezhdunarodnomu razvitiyu i interesy bezopasnosti v politike Yaponii [International Development Assistance and Security Interests in Japan’s Policy]. Problemy Dal’nego Vostoka [Far Eastern Affairs], 44 (4), 54 62. (In Russian).

4. Burnside, С., Dollar, D. (2000). Aid, Policies, and Growth. American Economic Review, 90 (4), 847 868.

5. Chang, F. (2023). Japan’s Security Engagement with the Philippines. Foreign Policy Research Institute. 28.08.2023. Retrieved May 09, 2025, from https://www.fpri.org/article/2023/08/japanssecurity-engagement-with-the-philippines/

6. Cho, K. (2024). A Study on the Effectiveness of Official Development Assistance (ODA) Under SDGs: Critical Reflection on the Discussion of Negative Effects of Aid Fragmentation. Journal of International Development Cooperation, 19 (1), 29 60. DOI:10.34225/jidc.2024.19.1.29.

7. Davydov, A. (2023). Vote for aid? How economic interaction with the United States affects countries voting patterns at the UN General Assembly. Puti k miru i bezopasnosti [Paths Towards Peace and Security], 65 (2), 25 41. DOI: 10.20542/2307-1494-2023-2-25-41.

8. Nowak-Lehmann, F., Martínez-Zarzoso, I., Herzer, D., et al. (2013). Does Foreign Aid Promote Recipient Exports to Donor Countries? Review of World Economics, 149, 505 535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-013-0155-4.

9. Shiga, H. (2023). The new dynamics of Japan’s Official Development Assistance in an era of great power competition. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 12 (1), 249 263. https://doi.org/10.1080/24761028.2023.2292438.

10. Tadem, E. C. (1990). Japan, the US and Official Development Assistance to the Philippines. Kasarinlan, 5 (4), 35 47.

11. Takayanagi, A. (1990). Why Japanese Aid Is Ineffective in Reducing Poverty. Kasarinlan, 5 (4), 29 34.

12. Trinidad, D. (2021). Japan's Official Development Assistance (ODA) to the Philippines. JICA Background Paper No. 12. Japan’s Development Cooperation: A Historical Perspective, May 2021.

13. Trinidad, D., and Cheng Chua, Karl Ian Uy. (Eds.) (2025). Philippines-Japan Relations in the Twenty-First Century: Change and Direction. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781003486954.

14. Tsunekawa, K. (2014). Objectives and institutions for Japan’s official development assistance (ODA): Evolution and challenges. JICA Research Institute, 66. February 2014. Retrieved May 08, 2025, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268503601_Objectives_and_institutions_for_Japan's_official_development_assistance_ODA_Evolution_and_challenges.