Interaction of the Russian Far East with Japan and South Korea under sanctions

The article presents a comparative study of the sanctions policy of Japan and the Republic of Korea towards Russia and the assessment of the impact of their sanctions on the development of RussianJapanese and Russian-South Korean cooperation in the Russian Far East. The research is based on a wide range of primary sources – information materials of Russian, Japanese, and South Korean governmental bodies, primary sources of personal origin, as well as analysis of media materials. Based on the results of the study of the economic ties of Russia, Japan, and South Korea (in the areas of trade, investment, finance, tourism, and transport) and their interaction in the educational and cultural-humanitarian spheres under sanctions restrictions, the authors come to the conclusion that the sanctions policies of Japan and South Korea towards Russia have a common basis due to their belonging to the “collective West,” and the antiRussian measures they take are aimed at weakening the industrial and technological potential of the Russian Federation. At the same time, like most of their Western partners, Japan and South Korea are not ready to impose such sanctions that could cause significant damage to their own economic and strategic interests. There are important differences in the sanctions approaches of Japan and South Korea – Japan pursues a much tougher policy towards Russia, not only limiting exports to Russia, but also imposing a ban on imports of a number of goods from Russia. South Korea is much more willing to maintain ties with Russia and its Far Eastern territories, despite the unfavorable political situation, which is expressed, in particular, in the ongoing official contacts between Primorsky Krai and Vladivostok and a number of provinces and municipalities of the Republic of Korea. The authors suggest that ties between the Russian Far East and South Korea can be quickly restored once the situation around Ukraine is resolved, while the prospects for restoring relations with Japan look much less certain. 

1. Minakir, P. (2023). Vneshnetorgovyi faktor ekonomiki fors-mazhora: prostranstvennyi manevr [The Foreign Trade Factor of the Force Majeure Economy: A Spatial Manoeuvre]. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika [Spatial Economics], 1, 7–19. (In Russian). https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2023.1.007-019

2. Panov, A.N. (2024). Vneshnepoliticheskoe nasledstvo prem’er-ministra Yaponii Abe Sindzo [Foreign policy legacy of Prime Minister of Japan Abe Shinzō]. Yaponskiye issledovaniya [Japanese Studies in Russia], 2, 21–40. (In Russian). DOI: 10.55105/2500-2872-2024-2-21-40

3. Sevastyanov, S. (2020). Perspektivy razvitiya transgranichnykh otnoshenii Dal’nego Vostoka Rossii v kontekste vydvinutykh vedushchimi stranami SVA strategii mezhdunarodnogo sotrudnichestva [Prospects for the Development of Transborder Relations of the Russian Far East in the Context of the Strategies of International Cooperation Put Forward by NEA Leading Powers]. Oikumena. Regionovedcheskie issledovaniya [Oikumena. Regional Studies], 4, 125–136. (In Russian). DOI: 10.24866/1998-6785/2020- 4/125-136

4. Streltsov, D. & Lukin, A. (2017). Rossiisko-yaponskie otnosheniya cherez prizmu teorii: realizm, konstruktivizm i dvukhurovnevye igry [Russian-Japanese Rapprochement Through the Lens of IR Theory: NeoClassical Realism, Constructivism, and Two-Level Games]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy [International Trends], 2, 44–63. (In Russian). DOI:10.17994/IT.2017.15.2.49.3

5. Timofeev I., Chupriyanova P., & Trotskaya K. (Eds.) (2023). Politika sanktsii: tseli, strategii, instrumenty: khrestomatiya. Izdanie 3-e, pererabotannoe i dopolnennoe [Sanctions Policy: Goals, Strategies, Instruments: A Reader. 3rd Edition, Revised and Supplemented]. Moscow: Russian International Affairs Council. (In Russian).