Collective memory and politics: “Comfort women” in current relations between South Korea and Japan

The article analyzes how the “comfort women” issue influences current relations between the Republic of Korea and Japan. In the early twentieth century Japan annexed Korea, and the memories of colonial-era humiliation are vivid in Korean collective consciousness. As a result, issues of the past often sour bilateral relations even today. Recently, Seoul has been actively pressing the issue of sexual slavery in Japanese military brothels, and differences over this seemingly irrelevant issue have impeded political and military cooperation. Articles on former sexual slaves (also called wianbu in Korean) have resurfaced time and again in Korean press throughout the 1940-80s, but the problem internationalized only in the 1990s, when broad public discussion started. Although Japan maintains that the 1965 bilateral normalization resolved all issues of the past, Tokyo has several times offered official condolences and compensations to the victims, however Seoul found these steps or the tone unsatisfactory. Most recently, in 2015, Abe Shinzo and Park Geunhye signed an agreement to close the wianbu issue, but the document irritated South Korean public and opposition, so Seoul abandoned it. President Moon Jaein, who came to power in 2017, continued this course and added pressure on related historical problems, such as Korean forced laborers in imperial Japan. As the crisis deepened, Tokyo introduced economic sanctions against South Korea (technically on unrelated grounds). Conflicts stemming from collective memory are a characteristic feature of North East Asian political culture. They are a popular tool in foreign and domestic policy of many countries. This, coupled with irrational nature of nationalism and imperfection of regional security, makes issues of the past a very real threat to the present.

collective memory, comfort women, Japan, relations between Japan and South Korea, Republic of Korea, wianbu

1. Асмолов К. Корейские «женщины для утешения» и скандал с Пак Ю Ха. URL: https://ru.journal-neo.org/2017/02/13/korejskie-zhenshhiny-dlya-utesheniya-i-skandal-s-pak-yu-ha/ (дата обращения: 25.07.2019).

2. Белые пятна - чёрные пятна: Сложные вопросы в российско-польских отношениях / под общ. ред. акад. А.В. Торкунова, проф. А.Д. Ротфельда. М.: Аспект Пресс, 2010. 823 с.

3. Дьячков И.В. Спор по поводу о. Токто (Такэсима): международно-политическое измерение национализма в СВА / И.В. Дьячков // XVII Научная конференция корееведов России и стран СНГ «Корея: уроки истории и вызовы современности». М.: ИДВ РАН, 2013. С. 102-112.

4. Ильчонбу токтосэу вианбу хальмони итхыль ёнсок хани 日정부, '독도새우·위안부할머니' 이틀 연속 항의 : [Японское правительство два дня подряд протестует против «креветок с Токто» и «бабушки-вианбу»] // Чосон ильбо 조선일보. URL: http://news.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2017/11/09/2017110900984.html (дата обращения: 25.07.2019).

5. Ким Сехён. Мун Чжэин - Абэ ссаум Тромпхы нугусон тырочжулькка? 김세형. 문재인-아베 싸움, 트럼프 누구손 들어줄까? : [Кого поддержит Трамп в схватке Мун Чжэина и Абэ?] // Мэиль кёнчже 매일경제. URL: https://www.mk.co.kr/premium/special-report/view/2019/07/26054/ (дата обращения: 25.07.2019).

6. Лобов Р. Подготовка и подписание Договора об основах отношений между Республикой Корея и Японией / Р. Лобов // Корея: 70 лет после освобождения. М.: ИДВ РАН, 2015. С. 113-120.

7. Неспокойное соседство: проблемы Корейского полуострова и вызовы для России / под ред. Г.Д. Толорая. Москва : МГИМО-Университет, 2015. 344 с.

8. Тэханмингукква ильбонгане чэсан мит чхонгукквоне кванхан мунчжее хэгёльгва кёнчжехёмнёге кванхан хёпчон 대한민국과 일본국간의 재산 및 청구권에 관한 문제의 해결과 경제협력에 관한 협정 : [Соглашение между Республикой Корея и Японией по урегулированию проблем, касающихся собственности, претензий и экономического сотрудничества]. URL: http://www.law.go.kr/trtyInfoP.do?mode=4&trtySeq=3678&chrClsCd=010202&vSct (дата обращения: 25.07.2019).

9. Тэханмингукква ильбонгане чэсан мит чхонгукквоне кванхан мунчжее хэгёльгва кёнчжехёмнёге кванхан хёпчон чесамчжо пучжагви вихонхвагин 대한민국과 일본국간의 재산 및 청구권에 관한 문제의 해결과 경제협력에 관한 협정 제3조 부작위 위헌확인 : [Подтверждение неконституционности бездействия по вопросу третьей статьи Соглашения между Республикой Корея и Японией по урегулированию проблем, касающихся собственности, претензий и экономического сотрудничества] // Конституционный суд Республики Корея. Официальный сайт. URL: http://www.ccourt.go.kr/cckhome/kor/info/precedent/selectRealmPrecedentInfo.do?searchClassSeq=366 (дата обращения: 25.07.2019).

10. Announcement by Foreign Ministers of Japan and the Republic of Korea at the Joint Press Occasion. URL: http://www.mofa.go.jp/a_o/na/kr/page4e_000364.html (дата обращения: 25.07.2019).

11. Arrington C. Japan claims it’s restricting exports to South Korea because of ‘national security.’ Here’s the real reason why // The Washington Post. URL: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/07/18/japan-claims-its-restricting-exports-south-korea-because-national-security-heres-real-reason-why/ (дата обращения: 25.07.2019).

12. Choe Sang-Hun. South Korea Signals End to ‘Final’ Deal With Japan Over Wartime Sex Slaves // The New York Times. URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/21/world/asia/south-korea-japan-sex-slaves.html (дата обращения: 25.07.2019).

13. Gil Yun-hyung. Did S. Korea operate “comfort stations” in the Vietnam War? // Hankyoreh. URL: http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_international/688436.html (дата обращения: 25.07.2019).

14. H.Res.121 - A resolution expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Government of Japan should formally acknowledge, apologize, and accept historical responsibility in a clear and unequivocal manner for its Imperial Armed Forces' coercion of young women into sexual slavery, known to the world as "comfort women", during its colonial and wartime occupation of Asia and the Pacific Islands from the 1930s through the duration of World War II. URL: https://www.congress.gov/bill/110th-congress/house-resolution/121/text (дата обращения: 25.07.2019).

15. Hein, P. Unresolved Comfort Women Issue: How Pragmatism Precludes Reconciliation / Patrick Hein // The Korean Journal of International Studies. 2016. Vol. 14. No. 3. P. 447-460.

16. Japan-funded 'comfort women' foundation in S. Korea formally closed. URL: https://mainichi.jp/english/articles/20190705/p2g/00m/0fp/053000c (дата обращения: 25.07.2019).

17. Kim M. Memorializing Comfort Women: Memory and Human Rights in Korea-Japan Relations / Kim Mikyoung //Asian Politics and Policy. 2014. Vol. 6. No. 1. P. 83-96.

18. Lee B. South Korea-Japan Comfort Women Agreement: Where Do We Go From Here? // The Diplomat. URL: https://thediplomat.com/2016/09/south-korea-japan-comfort-women-agreement-where-do-we-go-from-here/ (дата обращения: 25.07.2019).

19. Lee C.Y. The Deafening Silence of the Korean “Comfort Women”: A Response Based on Lyotard and Ingaray / C.Y. Lee, J. Crowe // Asian Journal of Law and Society. 2015. Vol. 2. Issue 2. P. 339-356.

20. Moon K.H.S. Sex Among Allies: Military Prostitution in U.S.-Korea Relations. New York: Columbia University Press, 1997. 336 p.

21. Moon K.H.S. South Korea’s Demographic Changes and their Political Impact. Washington: Brookings, 2015. 25 p.

22. Nozaki Y. The “Comfort Women” Controversy: History and Testimony / Nozaki Yoshiko // The Asia-Pacific Journal. 2005. Vol. 3. Issue 7. URL: https://apjjf.org/-Yoshiko-Nozaki/2063/article.pdf (дата обращения: 25.07.2019).

23. Osaka Severs Ties With San Francisco Over 'Comfort Women' Memorial // Time. URL: https://time.com/5416425/japan-osaka-san-francisco-comfort-women-statue/ (дата обращения: 25.07.2019).

24. Piper N. Transnational Women’s Activism in Japan and Korea: the Unresolved Issue of Military Sexual Slavery / N. Piper // Global Networks. 2001. 1 (2). P. 155-170.

25. Reexamining the “Comfort Women” Issue. An Interview with Yoshimi Yoshiaki // The Asia-Pacific Journal. 2015. Vol. 13. Issue 1. No. 1. URL: https://apjjf.org/-Yoshimi-Yoshiaki/4247/article.pdf (дата обращения: 25.07.2019)

26. Soh C.S. The Comfort Women: Sexual Violence and Postcolonial Memory in Korea and Japan. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 2008. 384 p

27. Statement by the Chief Cabinet Secretary Yohei Kono on the result of the study on the issue of “comfort women”. URL: http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/women/fund/state9308.html (дата обращения: 25.07.2019)

28. True Stories of the Korean Comfort Women / Korean Council for Women Drafted for Military Sexual Slavery by Japan ; ed. by K. Howard. London : Cassell, 1995. 200 p

29. United Nations Commission on Human Rights. Report on the mission to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea and Japan on the issue of military sexual slavery in wartime. URL: http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/commission/country52/53-add1.htm (дата обращения: 25.07.2019)

30. Varga A. National Bodies: The ‘Comfort Women’ Discourse and its Controversies in South Korea / A. Varga // Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism. 2009. Vol. 2. No. 2. P. 287-303

31. Wöhr U. A Touchstone for Transnational Feminism: Discourses on the Comfort Women in 1990s Japan / Ulrike Wöhr // Japanstudien. 2005. 16:1. P. 59-90

32. Yoshikata V. ‘Comfort Women’ Denial and the Japanese Right / Yoshikata Veki // The Asia-Pacific Journal. 2015. Vol. 13. Issue 30. No. 2. URL: https://apjjf.org/-Yoshikata-Veki--Norma-Field--Tomomi-Yamaguchi/4350/article.pdf (дата обращения: 25.07.2019)