Preview

Japanese Studies in Russia

Advanced search

The “Plotless Novel” debate: literary discussion between Akutagawa Ryunosuke and Tanizaki Jun’ichiro

https://doi.org/10.24411/2500-2872-2019-10028

Abstract

This article is devoted to one of the most well-known discussions in the literary circles of Japan at the beginning of the twentieth century, the dispute between Akutagawa Ryunoske and Tanizaki Jun’ichiro about the essence of prose, which was called the “plotless novel” debate. In 1927, when the discussion was published in the magazine “Kaizo”, literary life was concentrated in the circles of the creative elite, or bundan , within which various associations and magazines were created. During the discussion, Akutagawa proposed the concept of “poetic spirit” in a prose work as the central category of his aesthetic theory, implying the dominant role of the hero’s lyrical mood over the storyline. Akutagawa considered the work containing the “poetic spirit” to be the pinnacle of prose creativity and called such prose “a story without a story”, believing that the “interesting story” and interest in the story as such diminish the quality of the work, bringing it closer to the mass entertaining literature. Tanizaki, whose works Akutagawa criticized for “an interesting plot,” defended the story with many plot lines, arguing that this creates the “architectural beauty” of the work, which implies, firstly, its structural complexity, and, secondly, provides internal energy. In contrast to Akutagawa, Tanizaki did not consider the general accessibility of literature as a quality that crossed out its artistic value. In essence, this discussion, in which the recognized classics of modern literature present the basis of their aesthetic views, is a dispute about the role of pure literature ( junbungaku ) and mass ( taishū bungaku ) - a problem that will be most developed after Akutagawa’s death. This is the main significance of this dispute, which should rather be called a discussion, since there was no fundamental difference between the writers. The discussion took place due to differences in attitude, character, aesthetic perception, psychological organization of the writers, as well as the polarity of their life moments at that time. For Akutagawa, prone to melancholy, rational analysis, and intellectual perception of the world, the end of his life and the end of the era of "pure" literature was nearing, while Tanizaki, demonstrating a sensual-mystical worldview and confidently gathering the fruits of glory, still had much to do in his literary career.

About the Author

O. A. Zaberezhnaya
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation


References

1. Акутагава Рюноскэ, Танидзаки Дзюнъитиро. Бунгэйтэкина, амари ни бунгэйтэкина / дзё:дзэцуроку / Акутагава vs. Танидзаки ронсо: : [Литературное, слишком литературное / записи болтовни / спор Акутагава и Танидзаки]. Токио: Коданся бунгэй, 2017.

2. Биричевская О.Ю. Творчество Кикути Кана и проблемы японской массовой литературы «Тайсю Бунгаку» в первой половине XX века: автореф. дис. канд. филол.наук : Спец. 10.01.03 / Биричевская Ольга Юрьевна ; Санкт-Петерб. гос. ун-т. СПб., 2001.

3. Гривнин В.С. Творческий поиск Акутагавы Рюноскэ // Акутагава Рюноскэ. Беседа с богом странствий. СПб.: Азбука, 2000. 540 с. С. 5-24.

4. Забережная О.А. Эстетические взгляды писателя Сига Наоя // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 13: Востоковедение. 2015. No 2. 2015. С. 29-37.

5. Ли Хуэй Цзюэ. Акутагава Рю:носукэ но баннэн но бунгакукан: тайсё: макки ни океру «сё:сэцу но судзи» ронсо: : [Взгляд на литературу Акутагава Рюноскэ в поздний период творчества (Дискуссия о сюжете прозы в эпоху Тайсё)] // Матиканэяма ронсо. Культурная динамика 48. 2014. С. 95-110.

6. Мещеряков А.Н. Предисловие // Японская новелла / сост. А.Н. Мещеряков. Серия: Золотая серия японской литературы. СПб.: Северо-Запад Пресс, 2003. С. 5-16.

7. Culture and Identity: Japanese Intellectuals during the Interwar Years. Edited by Thomas J. Rimer. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.

8. Powell, Irena. Writers and Society in Modern Japan. Tokyo: Kodansha International, 1983.

9. Strecher, Mathew S. Purely Mass or Massively Pure? The Division Between 'Pure' and 'Mass' Literature // Monumenta Nipponica. Vol. 51, No. 3 (Autumn, 1996), pp. 357-374.

10. Suzuki, Sadami. Tanizaki Junichiro as a cultural Critic // Japan Review No. 7 (1996), pp. 23-32.

11. Ueda, Makoto. Modern Japanese Writers and the Nature of Literature. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1976.


Review

For citations:


Zaberezhnaya O.A. The “Plotless Novel” debate: literary discussion between Akutagawa Ryunosuke and Tanizaki Jun’ichiro. Japanese Studies in Russia. 2019;(4):60-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/2500-2872-2019-10028

Views: 1244


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2500-2872 (Online)