Preview

Japanese Studies in Russia

Advanced search

«Quiet» Olympics in Tokyo and its preliminary results

https://doi.org/10.24412/2500-2872-2021-4-62-78

Abstract

The 32nd Olympic and Paralympic Games, held in Tokyo in July-September 2021, had several important features, one being the events taking place amid the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic. It is not surprising that the Games were postponed for a year, the main events held without spectators, and the number of foreign visitors, officials, and support staff severely limited.

Nevertheless, the results of the sporting events were highly commendable. One should take note of the long list of participants from many countries, the variety of competitive events, and the number of world and Olympic records made. In addition, Japan recorded its best Olympic performance so far in terms of medals won. Measures to control the spread of infection also proved to be highly effective. Only a handful of cases were reported in the Olympic Village, and lack of transmission of the virus from the athletes to the volunteers and service personnel is proof of the effectiveness of the measures taken. It is not surprising that the Games' public perception in Japan gradually transitioned from negative to positive. The Games' economic benefits, however, need further assessment, as additional outlays for the implementation of antiinfection measures, ticket revenue loss, and some extra costs will likely mean lower economic benefits. Perhaps the most difficult task though is assessing what the Games symbolized. Tokyo's bid to host these Games was viewed as an effort to move on from the prolonged “lost decades,” a sign of recovery after the triple disaster of March 11, 2011, a way to showcase Japan's technological prowess, and a tool to improve the country's tourist destination image, among other things. Unfortunately, these aspects were poorly addressed during the Games, that is, the results of efforts made fell short of expectations.

Nonetheless, in spite of some initial skepticism, the final international assessments as well as public opinion in Japan turned out to be overwhelmingly positive. This indicates that the decision to hold the Games was correct, and the sporting extravaganza made a significant contribution to the Olympic movement.

About the Author

A. V. Belov
Fukui Prefectural University
Russian Federation

Andrey V. Belov - Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Professor, Fukui Prefectural University.

910-1195, Fukui, Yoshida-gun, Eiheiji-cho, Matsuoka-Kenjojima, 4-1-1.



References

1. Belov, A.V. (2021). Ekonomicheskaya politika Yaponii v period pandemii [Economic Policy of Japan in the Time of Pandemic]. Mirovaya Economika I Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya [World Economy and International Relations], 1(65), 33-40. (In Russian). DOI: 10.20542/0131-22272021-65-1-33-41

2. Belov, A.V., & Tikhotskaya, I.S. (2020). Pervaya volna pandemii COVID-19 v Yaponii: social'nye I ekonomicheskie aspekty [The First Wave of COVID- 1 9 Pandemic in Japan: Social and Economic Considerations]. Aziya I Afrika Segodnya [Asia and Africa Today], 10(743), 14-21. (In Russian). DOI: 10.31857/S032150750011106-8

3. Baade, R., & Matheson, V. (2016). Going for the Gold: The Economics of the Olympics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30 (2): 201-18. DOI: 10.1257/jep.30.2.201

4. Billings, S., & Holladay, J. (2010). Should Cities Go for the Gold? The Long-Term Impacts of Hosting the Olympics. Economic Inquiry, 50(3). DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1679126

5. Firgo, M. (2021). The Causal Economic Effects of Olympic Games on Host Regions. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 88 (2021), 103673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2021.103673

6. Heinrich, A., Müller F., & Cañal-Bruland R. (2021). Selection Bias in Social Facilitation Theory? Audience effects on elite biathletes' performance are gender-specific. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 55(2021), 101943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.101943

7. Hiller, H., & Wanner R. (2018). Public Opinion in Olympic Cities: From Bidding to Retrospection. Urban Affairs Review, 54(5), 962-993.

8. Madden, J. (2006). Economic and Fiscal Impacts of Mega Sporting Events: a General Equilibrium Assessment. Public Finance and Management, 6 (3), 246-394.

9. Miyoshi, K., & Sasaki, M. (2016). The Long-Term Impacts of the 1998 Nagano Winter Olympic Games on Economic and Labor Market Outcomes. Asian Economic Policy Review, 11(1), 43-65.

10. Osada, M., Ojima, M., Kurachi, Y., Miura, K., & Kawamoto, T. (2016). Economic Impact of the Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games. Bank of Japan Research Papers, 16-01-21. Retrieved September 20, 2021, from https://www.boj.or.jp/en/research/brp/ron_2016/data/ron160121b.pdf

11. Ribeiro, T., Correia, A., & Biscaia, R. (2020). The Social Impact of the 2016 Rio Olympic Games: Comparison of Residents' Pre- and Post-event Perceptions. Sport, Business and Management, 11(2), 201-221. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBM-02-2020-0014

12. Wunderlich, W., & Memmert R. (2021). How does Spectator Presence Affect Football? Home Advantage Remains in European Top-class Football Matches Played without Spectators During the COVID-19 Pandemic. PLoS ONE, 16(3), e0248590. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248590


Review

For citations:


Belov A.V. «Quiet» Olympics in Tokyo and its preliminary results. Japanese Studies in Russia. 2021;(4):62-78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/2500-2872-2021-4-62-78

Views: 509


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2500-2872 (Online)