Preview

Japanese Studies in Russia

Advanced search

Evolution of the Tokyo Tribunal's representation in the historical narratives of right-wing conservative non-state in Japan

https://doi.org/10.55105/2500-2872-2025-3-85-105

Abstract

The article focuses on examining the evolution of the memory of the Tokyo Tribunal in historical narratives championed by conservative non-governmental organizations in Japan and the impact these organizations had on historical memory in the country. Among the organizations examined are the Association of Shinto Shrines, the Japan Association of War-Bereaved Families, the Association to Answer the Departed War Heroes, the Society for History Textbook Reform, and the Japan Conference. As a theoretical framework, the research applies the approach of O. Malinova, who considers the politics of memory as a variation of symbolic politics, a struggle between various actors for the dominance of their historical narratives in the public sphere.
The study traces the evolution of perceptions of the Tokyo Tribunal within three periods: 1945—1960, 1960—1985, and 1985—present. In the early stages, right-wing conservative organizations avoided direct criticism of the Tokyo Trials, while developing a policy of remembrance that implicitly contradicted the foundations of the order established by the tribunal and the occupation reforms. The efforts of these groups, primarily Shinto associations and veterans’ and war-bereaved families’ associations, were aimed at achieving certain “special interests”: restoring state funding and raising their social status.
In the second period, criticism of the tribunal became more overt. Due to the need to establish their ideological and historical views among the younger generation, and amidst growing national pride due to economic success, right-wing conservatives consolidated around propelling the cult of fallen war heroes (eirei), which was ritualized at the Yasukuni Shrine. During the same period, 14 individuals recognized by the Tokyo Tribunal as Class A war criminals were enshrined there.
The third period is characterized by the open expression of revisionist views, criticism of the “Tokyo Tribunal's view of history.” New influential right-wing organizations emerged, promoting the reform of school textbooks and educational standards along “patriotic lines.” In recent decades, a new trend has gained momentum: against the backdrop of the decline of the once powerful Association of War-Bereaved Families, owing to the ageing of its members, the efforts of right-wing conservative organizations are increasingly focused on the revision of anti-war articles in the Constitution, while the issues of the Tokyo Tribunal are taking a back seat.

About the Author

I. P. Fokin
Institute of Asian and African Studies of Moscow State University; Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO-University)
Russian Federation

Fokin Iaroslav P., PhD student, researcher

11/1, Mokhovaya Street, Moscow, 125009

76, Vernadskogo Prospect, Moscow, 119454



References

1. Assman, Ya. (2004). Kul'turnaya pamyat': Pis'mo, pamyat' o proshlom i politicheskaya identichnost' v vysokikh kul'turakh drevnosti [Cultural Memory: Writing, Memory of the Past, and Political Identity in the High Cultures of Antiquity]. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul’tury. (In Russian).

2. Malinova, O. Yu. (2018). Politika pamyati kak oblast' simvolicheskoi politiki [Memory Politics as an Area of Symbolic Politics]. In Miller, A.I., Efremenko, D.V. (eds.), Metodologicheskie voprosy izucheniya politiki pamyati [Methodological Issues of Studying Memory Policy] (pp. 27—53). Moscow — Saint Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya. (In Russian).

3. Barshay, A. (1998). Postwar Social and Political Thought, 1945—90. In Wakabayashi, B.T. (ed.), Modern Japanese Thought (pp. 273—356). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

4. Bukh, A. (2007). Japan’s History Textbooks Debate: National Identity in Narratives of Victimhood and Victimization. Asian Survey, 47 (5), 683—704.

5. Chanlett-Avery, E., Manyin, M., Rinehart, I., Nelson, R., Williams, B. (2015). CRS Report. Japan-U.S. Relations: Issues for Congress. September 29. Congressional Research Service. Retrieved May 16, 2025, from URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20160304061604/ http://fas.org:8080/sgp/crs/row/RL33436.pdf

6. Creemers, W. (1968). Shrine Shinto after World War II. Leiden: E.J. Brill.

7. Dian, M. (2017). Contested Memories in Chinese and Japanese Foreign Policy. Oxford: Elsevier.

8. Glossary. Birth of the Constitution. National Diet Library. Retrieved May 16, 2025, from URL: https://www.ndl.go.jp/constitution/e/etc/glossary.html#:~:text=This%20was%20a%20directive%20issued,government%20had%20been%20systematically%20controlling

9. Hardacre, H. (1989). Shintô and the State, 1868—1988. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

10. Hardacre, H. (2021). Nippon Kaigi Working for Constitutional Revision. In Hardacre, H., et al. (eds.), Japanese Constitutional Revisionism and Civic Activism (pp. 175—192). Lanham, Boulder, New York, London: Lexington Books.

11. He, Y. (2009). The search for reconciliation: Sino-Japanese and German-polish relations since World War II. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

12. Igarashi, Y. (2000). Bodies of Memory: Narratives of War in Postwar Japanese Culture, 1945—1970. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

13. Jinja Honchô // Encyclopedia of Shinto. Retrieved May 16, 2025, from URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20210226043217/http://eos.kokugakuin.ac.jp/modules/xwords/entry.php?entryID=1106


Review

For citations:


Fokin I.P. Evolution of the Tokyo Tribunal's representation in the historical narratives of right-wing conservative non-state in Japan. Japanese Studies in Russia. 2025;(3):85-105. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55105/2500-2872-2025-3-85-105

Views: 7


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2500-2872 (Online)