The perception of the problems of Japanese society through the prism of “Critical Buddhism”

The article examines the so-called “Critical Buddhism,” which is a specific trend in Japanese Buddhist philosophy that has become widespread since the 1980s and has questioned the “truth” of both Japanese Buddhism itself and the entire Far Eastern Buddhist tradition due to their gross discrepancies with the Indian roots of the teaching. The main ideologists of the movement were Matsumoto Shirō and Hakamaya Noriaki, professors at Komazawa University and followers of the Sōtō school. The author analyzes the social aspect of their criticism, which caused the greatest resonance at the initial stages of development of “Critical Buddhism.” Arguing that Japanese Buddhism had actually created and supported the oppression of the Burakumin (Japanese “untouchables”) by imposing the ideas of “Buddha-nature” and “original enlightenment” on the population over the centuries, Hakamaya and Matsumoto accused the teaching itself and its adherents (including themselves) of departing from the true precepts of the Buddha, the key one of which was the renunciation of one’s own self for the sake of another. The spread of doctrines of imaginary equality, according to Hakamaya and Matsumoto, reinforced the existing problems in society, depriving believers of the need to make any unpleasant moral choices, since, if “Buddha-nature” was present in everything, then social discrimination was also a state of affairs pleasing to Buddha himself. By analyzing academic studies of the ideologists of “Critical Buddhism,” it is shown that they did not seek any compromise option for further coexistence of Buddhism in Japan with the doctrines of hongaku and “Buddha-nature” due to their initially heretical nature and the severity of the harm inflicted on society. It is also shown how Japanese feminism actively responded to the agenda of “Critical Buddhism,” adding gender discrimination, which had not gone away, to caste discrimination in Buddhism. The author concludes that this movement, although unable to bring about fundamental changes in Buddhology and society, was not in vain, since it once again highlighted the importance of the ethical aspect of Buddhism and the public demand for reforming Buddhism in Japan. 

1. Alldritt, L. D. (2000). The Burakumin: The Complicity of Japanese Buddhism in Oppression and an Opportunity for Liberation. Journal of Buddhist Ethics: On-line Conference on “Socially Engaged Buddhism” (April 7–14, 2000). Retrieved May 7, 2024, from http://kusala.online-dhamma.net/%E6%96%87%E5%AD%97%E8%B3%87%E6%96%99/%E5%8D%97%E5%82%B3%E4%BD%9B%E6%95%99%E5%9C%96%E6%9B%B8%E9%A4%A8%20Theravada%20Buddhism%20E-Library/054%2-0%E9%9B%9C%E8%AA%8C%20Magazine/Journal%20of%20Buddhist%20Ethics/JBE/www.jbe. gold.ac.uk/7/alldritt001.html.

2. Bodiford, W. (1996). Zen and the Art of Religious Prejudice: Efforts to Reform a Tradition of Social Discrimination. Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, 23/1–2, 1–27.

3. Hakamaya, Noriaki. (1990). Hihan bukkyō [Critical Buddhism]. Tokyo: Daizō Shuppan. (In Japanese).

4. Heine, S. (1994). “Critical Buddhism” (Hihan Bukkyō) and the Debate Concerning the 75-fascicle and 12-fascicle Shōbōgenzō Texts. Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, 21/1, 37–72.

5. Heine, S. (2001). After the Storm: Matsumoto Shirō’s Transition from “Critical Buddhism” to “Critical Theology” (Review Article). Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, 28/1–2, 133–146.

6. Hubbard, J. & Swanson, P.L. (Eds.). (1997). Pruning the Bodhi Tree: The Storm Over Critical Buddhism. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

7. Kawahashi, Noriko. (2016, January 7). When It Comes to Gender Equality, Religion in Japan Lags Behind. Divinity School, the University of Chicago. Retrieved June 6, 2024, from https://divinity.uchicago.edu/sightings/articles/when-it-comes-gender-equality-religion-japan-lags-behind.

8. Kitagawa, J. M. (1966). Religion in Japanese History. New York: Columbia University Press.

9. Lepekhova, E. (2022). Buddizm i sotsializm v filosofii Seno Giro (1890-1961) [Buddhism and Socialism in the Philosophy of Seno’o Giro (1890–1961)]. Filosofskii zhurnal, 15(2), 109–121. (In Russian).

10. Matsumoto, S. (2001, May 2). Critiques of Tathāgatagarbha Thought and Critical Buddhism. Public lecture at the Divinity School, the University of Chicago. Retrieved April 20, 2024, from http://repo.komazawa-u.ac.jp/opac/repository/all/14431/jbs033-20.pdf.

11. Matsumoto, Shirō. (1989). Engi to kū: Nyoraizō shisō hihan [Causality and Emptiness: A Critique of Tathāgatagarbha Thought]. Tokyo: Daizō Shuppan. (In Japanese).

12. Shields, J. M. (2023). A Century of Critical Buddhism in Japan. Faculty Contributions to Books. Retrieved May 25, 2024, from https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/fac_books/261.

13. Swanson, P. L. (1993). “Zen is Not Buddhism”: Recent Japanese Critiques of Buddha-Nature. Numen, 40 (2), 115–149.

14. Torchinov, E. (2000). Vvedenie v buddologiyu: kurs lektsii [Introduction to Buddhology: A course of lectures]. Sankt-Peterburgskoe filosofskoe obshhestvo. Retrieved March 15, 2024, from http://anthropology.ru/ru/edition/vvedenie-v-buddologiyu-kurs-lekciy. (In Russian).