The archaeological direction in Japanese studies in Russia: Development, peculiarities, personal experience
https://doi.org/10.55105/2500-2872-2024-2-70-82
Abstract
The archaeological direction in the Japanese studies in Russia originated at the end of the 19th century on the basis of the first trips and acquaintance with the antiquities of Japan (M.I. Venyukov, A.V. Grigoriev, I.S. Polyakov, D.M. Pozdneev), and transformed into an original direction in the Soviet period. The fruitful dialogue between Russian and Japanese archaeologists is largely due to both the territorial proximity and common roots of ancient cultures, starting from the Stone Age, as well as mutual interest in the archaeology of the Pacific basin as a whole. Since the early 1960s, one of the leading roles in this collaboration is played by the Novosibirsk Scientific Center (Institute of History, Philology and Philosophy, Siberian Branch of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Faculty of Humanities of NSU) and such specialists as A.P. Okladnikov, A.P. Derevyanko, R.S. Vasilevsky, and V.E. Larichev. In the first post-Soviet decade, there was a transition to new formats – long-term joint projects and archaeological expeditions, which are carried out on the basis of bilateral agreements between research organizations in Japan and Russian institutes (universities, museums) from a number of cities in Siberia and the Russian Far East. Cooperation reached its peak in 2007/8–2019, enjoying the support of Russian (RSFH, RFBR, RSF) and Japanese scientific foundations, and was implemented in a variety of formats (projects, exchanges, internships, symposiums, exhibitions, publications, etc.) and in a variety of geographical areas, both in Russia and Japan, as well as third countries – in Central Asia (Mongolia) and South America (Ecuador). One of the striking examples of such interaction is the fruitful cooperation of the Division of Foreign Archaeology (Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography SB RAS, Novosibirsk) and the Laboratory of Archaeology (Tohoku University, Sendai), resulting in a large number of publications in leading scientific journals and several dissertation studies on the Jomon and Kofun periods.
About the Author
A. V. TabarevRussian Federation
Tabarev Andrei V., Doctor of Sciences (History), Docent, Leading Research Fellow, Head of the Division of Foreign Archaeology
630090, Novosibirsk, Lavrentieva Ave., 17
References
1. Arutjunov, S. (1961). Etnograficheskaya poezdka v Yaponiyu [Ethnographical Trip to Japan]. Sovetskaya etnografiya, 3, 77–89. (In Russian).
2. Chan Su Bu. (1977). Pozdnii dzemon Hokkaido [Late Jomon of Hokkaido]. Candidate of Sciences Dissertation Summary. Novosibirsk. (In Russian).
3. Derevyanko, A. & Kononenko, N. (Eds.). (2003). Okhotniki-sobirateli basseina Japonskogo morya na rubezhe pleistotsena – golotsena [Hunter-gatherers of the Japanese Sea Basin on the Pleistocene-Holocene Border]. Novosibirsk: Izdatel’stvo Instituta arkheologii i etnografii SO RAN. (In Russian).
4. Derevyanko, A. & Molodin, V. (1992). Rossiisko-yaponskaya programma «Pazyryk» – pervyi god sovmestnykh issledovanii [Russian-Japanese Program “Pazyryk” – The First Year of Joint Research]. Vestnik drevnei istorii, 3, 227–229. (In Russian).
5. Derevyanko, A. (1975). Kamennyi vek Severnoi, Vostochnoi i Central’noi Azii: kurs lekcii [Stone Age of North, East, and Central Asia: Lecture Course]. Novosibirsk: Novosibirskii gosudarstvennyi universitet. (In Russian).
6. Derevyanko, A. (1984). Paleolit Japonii [The Paleolithic of Japan]. Novosibirsk: Nauka. (In Russian).
7. Egami, N. (1957). Proshloe i nastoyashchee yaponskoi arkheologii [Past and Present of the Japanese Archaeology]. Sovetskaya arkheologiya, 2, 305–307. (In Russian).
8. Filippov, A. (2021). Yaponovedenie v Rossii: traditsii klassiki i trendy peremen [Japanese Studies in Russia: Classic Traditions and Trends of Changes]. Kontury global’nykh transformatsii: politika, ekonomika, pravo, 14(6), 92–116. (In Russian).
9. Gnezdilova, I. (2020). Pogrebal’nye kompleksy perioda Kofun (III–VII veka nashei ery) na territorii ravniny Nara, ostrov Khonsyu, Japonskii Arkhipelag (po dannym arkheologii) [Kofun Period, 3rd–7th Centuries AD, burial complexes in the territory of the Nara Valley, Honshu, Japanese Archipelago (Based on Archaeological Data)]. Candidate of Sciences dissertation summary. Novosibirsk. (In Russian).
10. Ivanova, D. (2018). Srednii dze:mon ostrova Honsyu (5-4 tys. l.n.): obshchie kharakteristiki i lokal’nye osobennosti [Middle Jomon on Honshu (5 – 4,000 BP): common traits and local peculiarities]. Candidate of Sciences dissertation summary. Novosibirsk. (In Russian).
11. Komissarov, S., Solov’eva, E., Tabarev, A., & Solov’ev, A. (2018). Osnovnye etapy drevnei istorii Yaponii (materialy k uchebnomu kursu «Arkheologiya zarubezhnoi Azii») [Main Stages of the Ancient History of Japan (Materials for the Lecture Course “Archaeology of Foreign Asia”)]. Vestnik NGU. Arheologiya i etnografiya, 17(5), 9–20. (In Russian).
12. Kononenko, N. & Tabarev, A. (1994). Rossiisko-yaponskaya arkheologicheskaya ekspeditsiya v Primor’e [Russian-Japanese Archaeological Expedition in the Maritime Region]. Vestnik DVO RAN, 1, 125–126. (In Russian).
13. Kuznetsov, A., Krupyanko, A., & Tabarev, A. (2005). Novye materialy po arkheologicheskomu izucheniyu doliny reki Zerkal’noi (Primor’e) [New Data on the Archaeological Exploration of the Zerkal’naya River Valley, Maritime Region]. Comparative Study on the Neolithic Culture Between East Asia and Japan 1. 21 COE Program Archaeology Series, 4, 143–150. (In Russian).
14. Larichev, V. (1970). Paleolit i mezolit Yaponii [The Paleolithic and Mesolithic of Japan]. In V. Larichev (ed.), Sibir’ i ee sosedi v drevnosti [Siberia and Its Neighbors in Antiquity] (pp. 66–108). Novosibirsk: Nauka. (In Russian).
15. Lavrov, E. (1984) Dokeramicheskii period Hokkaido i sopredel’nykh territorii [Pre-ceramic Period of Hokkaido and Adjacent Territories]. Candidate of Sciences dissertation summary. Novosibirsk. (In Russian).
16. Lavrov, E. (1988). Arkheologicheskie issledovaniya v Japonii v 1987 g. [Archaeological Studies in Japan in 1987]. Izvestiya Sibirskogo otdeleniya AN SSSR. Seriya istorii, filologii i filosofii, 16, 62–63. (In Russian).
17. Medvedev, V. (1988). Vystavka «Kul’tura Sibiri» v Yaponii [Exibition «Culture of Siberia» in Japan]. Izvestiya Sibirskogo otdeleniya AN SSSR. Seriya istorii, filologii i filosofii, 16, 64–65. (In Russian).
18. Okladnikov, A. & Goreglyad, V. (1958). Novye dannye o drevneishei kul’ture kamennogo veka na severe Yaponii [New Data on the Most Ancient Stone Age Culture in Northern Japan]. Sovetskaya arkheologiya, 3, 246–250. (In Russian).
19. Okladnikov, A. (1946). K voprosu o drevneishem naselenii Yaponskikh ostrovov i ego kul’ture [On the Question of the Most Ancient Population of the Japanese Archipelago and Its Culture]. Sovetskaya etnografiya, 4, 11–33. (In Russian).
20. Okladnikov, A. (1958). Pamyatniki drevnei Yaponii [Sites of Ancient Japan]. Neva, 3, 217–218. (In Russian).
21. Shternberg, L. (1929). Ainskaya problema [The Ainu Problem]. Sbornik Muzeya antropologii i etnografii, 8, 334–380. (In Russian).
22. Solov’eva, E. (2005). Dogu: klassifikatsiya i interpretatsiya [Dogu: Classification and Interpretation]. Candidate of Sciences dissertation summary. Novosibirsk. (In Russian).
23. Startsev, A. (2001). Muzei arkheologii i etnografii Instituta istorii DVO RAN [Museum of Archaeology and Ethnography, Institute of History, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. Rossiya i ATR, 4, 149–155. (In Russian).
24. Streltsov, D. (Ed.). (2015). Sovremennoe rossiiskoe yaponovedenie: oglyadyvayas’ na put’ dlinoyu v chetvert’ veka [Modern Russian Japanese Studies: Looking Back at the Path of a Quarter of a Century]. Moskva: AIRO-XXI. (In Russian).
25. Tabarev, A. & Ivanova, D. (2020). Vnachale bylo slovo: iz istorii termina «dzemon» v rossiiskoi arkheologicheskoi literature [In the Beginning Was the Word: From the History of the Term «Jomon» in Russian Archaeological Literature]. Pervobytnaya arkheologiya. Zhurnal mezhdistsiplinarnykh issledovanii, 2, 62–76. (In Russian).
26. Tabarev, A., Markos, H., & Popov, A. (2013). Ekvador: po sledam odnoi neobychnoi arkheologicheskoi gipotezy [Ecuador: Following the Traces of One Unusual Archaeological Hypothesis]. Nauka iz pervykh ruk, 5–6, 124–141. (In Russian).
27. Vasil’evskij, R. (1981). Po sledam drevnikh kul’tur Hokkaido [Following the Traces of the Ancient Cultures of Hokkaido]. Novosibirsk: Nauka. (In Russian).
28. Vasil’evskij, R., Lavrov, E., & Chan Su Bu. (1982). Kul’tury kamennogo veka Severnoi Yaponii [Stone Age Cultures of Northern Japan]. Novosibirsk: Nauka. (In Russian).
29. Vorob’ev, M. (1953). Kamennyi vek stran Japonskogo morya [Stone Age of the Countries of the Japanese Sea]. Candidate of Sciences dissertation summary. Leningrad. (In Russian).
30. Vorob’ev, M. (1958). Drevnyaya Yaponiya. Istoriko-arheologicheskii ocherk [Ancient Japan. Historicalarchaeological Sketch]. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo vostochnoi literatury. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Tabarev A.V. The archaeological direction in Japanese studies in Russia: Development, peculiarities, personal experience. Japanese Studies in Russia. 2024;(2):70-82. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55105/2500-2872-2024-2-70-82