Defense diplomacy of Japan, China, and Russia in Southeast Asia: Strategies and tactics of implementation
https://doi.org/10.55105/2500-2872-2024-1-111-125
Abstract
The article undertakes a comparative analysis of strategies and forms of implementation of the defense diplomacy of Japan, China, and Russia in Southeast Asia. All the three above-mentioned countries seriously accelerated their defense ties with the states of the region in the 2010s both at the bilateral track and within the multilateral frameworks. The article focuses on Japan, China, and Russia due to the specifics of their relations with the region. All three countries have historical limitations in developing defense diplomacy in Southeast Asia. However, as this article argues, throughout the past decade, all the three have been actively emphasizing defense diplomacy as one of the pillars of their advancement in the region. There is a number of publications, in Russia and abroad, which study either bilateral forms of defense diplomacy or the activities of such ASEAN-centered regional institutions as the ASEAN Regional Forum, ADMM+, the ASEAN Expanded Maritime Forum, or externally generated frameworks like the Shangri-La Dialogue. However, up to nowadays, none of these publications undertook a comparative analysis of defense diplomacy strategies and tactics of Japan, China, and Russia. This article aims to bridge this analytical gap. Methodologically the article undertakes the comparative analysis of defense diplomacy of the three countries in question. The main parameters for comparison were the doctrinal frameworks of defense diplomacy (analysis of national security documents), case studies of the Southeast Asian states most important for the advancement of Japan, China, and Russia’s defense diplomacy and the instruments of defense diplomacy development at the bilateral (intergovernmental frameworks, military-technical cooperation, joint exercises, port calls, etc.) and multilateral levels (within ASEAN-centered institutions).
About the Author
E. V. KoldunovaRussian Federation
Koldunova Ekaterina V., PhD (Political Science), Associate Professor, Director of the ASEAN Centre, Associate Professor of the Department of Asian and African Studies
119454 Moscow, Vernadskogo Av., 76
References
1. Dikarev, A. (2018). Gosudarstva ASEAN v politike Kitaia: kurs na raskol ili “novyi consensus”? [Southeast Asian States in the Foreign Policy of China: cleavage or a “new consensus”?]. Sravnitel’naia politika [Comparative Politics Russia], 9, 3, 75–87. (In Russian).
2. Kireeva, A. (2021). Strategicheskoe partnerstvo Iaponii i V’etnama: interesy i ogranichiteli [Strategic Partnership of Japan and Vietnam: interests and limitations]. V’etnamskie issledovaniia [Vietnamese Studies], 5, 4, 6–25. (In Russian).
3. Koldunova, E. (2017). “Dialogovye partnerstva” vo vneshnei politike ASEAN [Dialogue Partnerships in ASEAN’s Foreign Policy]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy [International Trends], 15, 3, 55–66. (In Russian).
4. Mosiakov, D., Shpakovskaia, M., Pon’ka, T. (2023). Rol’ voennoi diplomatii vo vneshnei politike KNR v Iuzhno-Kitaiskom more [The Role of Military Diplomacy in PRC’s Foreign Policy in the South China Sea]. Vestnik RUDN. Seriia: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia [Vestnik RUDN. International Relations], 23, 2, 358–371. (In Russian).
5. Strel’tsov, D. (2023). O novoi kontseptsii natsional’noi bezopasnosti Iaponii [On the New National Security Strategy of Japan]. Problemy Dal’nego Vostoka [Issues of the Far Eastern Studies], 2, 9–25. (In Russian).
6. Vershinina, V. (2020) Soveshchanie ministrov oborony stran-chlenov ASEAN i dialogovykh partnerov (SMOA+) kak novyi element formiruiushcheisia arkhitektury bezopasnosti v IuVA [ADMM+ as a New Element of the Regional Security Architecture in Southeast Asia]. Iugo-Vostochnaia Aziia: aktual’nye problemy razvitiia [Southeast Asia: Current Issues of Development], 4 (49), 34–46. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Koldunova E.V. Defense diplomacy of Japan, China, and Russia in Southeast Asia: Strategies and tactics of implementation. Japanese Studies in Russia. 2024;(1):111-125. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55105/2500-2872-2024-1-111-125