Insularity as a core of ethnocultural identity (a comparative study of Great Britain and Japan)

The formation of cultural characteristics of a nation as well as the peculiarities of its worldview and ethnic psychology are largely influenced by the geographical factor which comprises the location of a country, its climate, the access or absence of access to seas, oceans, etc. One of relatively new terms in the Russian and foreign humanities is “insularity” which is understood as “isolated origin,” or “island location,” or “the island effect.” The notion of insularity is not only constituted by the fact of geographic isolation, but it also includes certain cultural, political, and ethnocultural features. The study aims to analyze the effect of the geographic insulation of Great Britain and Japan on the formation of island mentality and specific socio-cultural characteristics of these two island nations. The authors discuss the defining role of the geographical factor in the formation of the aforesaid characteristics of the British and the Japanese. The article particularly focuses on the study of national character traits typical of the two insular cultures. The study argues that the insular location of Great Britain and Japan as well as the climatic and natural conditions of these countries not only predetermined the specifics of human settlement and their economy but also shaped the mentality and worldviews of the people inhabiting the islands. The key factor in forming the national identity of both the British and the Japanese is the image of the Other, the image of the enemy. The distinction between the Self and the Other has underpinned a number of key national values. At the same time, the insular cultures of the UK and Japan display certain differences. Japan is a country with a distinct hierarchical social organization in which respect for older people and superiors is a key cultural characteristic. In contrast, the UK has a less hierarchical individualistic society. Furthermore, Japan is more conventional from the point of view of its cultural and religious institutions, norms and values. In its turn, the UK is more modern and possesses an ability to flexibly incorporate other cultural traits and new ideas. Finally, Japanese culture focuses more on collectivist practices whereas the UK being partly under the influence of European mentality is more oriented towards individualism and personal freedom.

1. Baranova, L.L., Mishina L.F. (2021). Verbal’noe otrazhenie kontsepta ‘insularity’ kak sostavnoi chasti ponyatiinoi kartiny mira britantsev (na materiale zhurnala The Economist) [Verbal Reflction of the “Insularity” Concept as Part of the British Conceptual Worldview (Based on the Material of The Economist Magazine)]. Bulletin of Samara University. History, Pedagogics, Philology, 27(2), 112–121. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-0445-2021-27-2-112-121. (In Russian).

2. Black, J. (2008). Istoriya Britanskikh ostrovovIstorija Britanskih ostrovov [A History of the British Isles]. Saint Petersburg: Evraziyja, 2008. (In Russian).

3. Fukuyama, F. (1997). Konfutsianstvo i demokratiya [Confucianism and Democracy] Retrieved May 3, 2023, from http://www.hrono.ru/libris/lib_f/fukuyama03.html?ysclid=lh7fobymqn468635742

4. Gachev, G.D. (1995). Natscional’’nye obrazy mira. Kosmo-Psikho-Logos [National Iimages of the Wworld. Cosmo-Psycho-Logos]. Moscow: Progress-Kul’’tura. (In Russian).

5. Grishachev, S.V. (2015). Kontakty Rossii so stranami Dal’’nego Vostoka v XVIII–XIX vv. [Contacts of Russia with the Countries of the Far East in the 18th–19th Centuries]. In A.V. Torkunov, M. Iokibe (Eds.), // Rossiisko-yaponskie otnosheniya v formate parallel’’noi istorii [Russian-Japanese Relations in the Format of a Parallel History]. A.V. Torkunov, M. Iokimbeh (Eds.). Moscow: MGIMO – University. (In Russian).

6. Klakhon, K.K.M. (1998). Zerkalo dlyja cheloveka: Vvedenie v antropologiyju [Mirror for Man : Introduction to Anthropology]. Saint Petersburg: Evraziyja. (In Russian).

7. Kozhevnikov, V.V. (2014). Sinto i natsionalizm v Yaponii (problema khrama Yasukuni) [Shinto and Nationalism in Japan: Tthe Problem of the Yasukuni Shrine]. Rossiya i ATR [Russia and Asia-Pacifi],. 4 (86),. С. 166–179. (In Russian).

8. Meshcheryakov, A.N. (2004). Kniga yaponskikh simvolov. Kniga yaponskikh obyknovenii [Book of Japanese CharactersSymbols. Book of Japanese Customs]. Moscow: Natalis. (In Russian).

9. Mil’’kov, F.N., Berezhnoi,j A.V., Mikhno, V.B. (1993). Terminologicheskiij slovar’’ po fiicheskoij geografi [Terminological Dictionary of Physical Geography]. Moscow: Vysshayja shkola. (In Russian).

10. More, Th. (2022). Utopiyja [Utopia]. In Klassicheskayja utopiyja [Classical Utopia] (pp. 3–152). Moscow: AST. (In Russian).

11. Orlyanskaya, T.G. (2009). Istoki svoeobraziya yaponskoi kul’’tury [The Origins of the Originality of Japanese Culture]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 19. Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya [Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 19. Linguistics and, Iintercultural Ccommunication] 19. Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya,. 4, 46–57. (In Russian).

12. Panov, A.N. (2012). Institut imperatora i ego mesto v gosudarstvennoi sisteme sovremennoi Yaponii [The Institute of the Emperor and hisIts Place in the State System of Modern Japan]. // Ezhegodnik Yaponiya [Yearbook Japan,]. 41,. 172–185. (In Russian).

13. Repina, L. (2020). Proshloe dlya nastoyashchego: Istoriya-pamyat’ i narrativy natsional’noi identichnosti: kollektivnaya monografiaProshloe dlja nastojashhego: Istorija-pamjat’ i narrativy nacional’noj identichnosti: kollektivnaja monografia [The Past for the Present : History / Memory and Narratives of National Identity]. Moscow: Akvilon. (In Russian).

14. Volkova, E.V. (2022). Sravnitel’nyi analiz yazykovykh kontseptov «INSULARITY» i «GEZELLIGHEID» v britanskoi i niderlandskoi kartinakh mira Sravnitel’nyj analiz jazykovyh konceptov «INSULARITY» i «GEZELLIGHEID» v britanskoj i niderlandskoj kartinah mira [Comparative Analysis of the Linguistic Concepts “INSULARITY” and “GEZELLIGHEID” in the British and Dutch Worldviews]. Modern Scientist, 6, 16–19. (In Russian).